📰 Jesse Blaze Calls It: The Week Everybody Courted the Machines — October 27, 2026
Hey folks, Jesse here 👋 — America’s feeling outnumbered and underhoused again today, so I dug in, snorted some data dust, and came back with the goods. Let’s go.
🗳️ Campaigns Are Now Gaming the Chatbots
Campaigns spent years gaming search results. Now they’re gaming the assistant voters ask instead, and the pitch is exactly as unsubtle as you’d fear. Whether it works is another story.
Reuters saw a PowerPoint prepared for Mike Minogue, the Republican challenger to Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey, aimed at getting ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and other chatbots to present him as the preferred pick on key issues. The technique is generative engine optimization, SEO’s chatbot-era sequel. yahoo
Deep breath, though: it’s a pitch, not proof. Run for Something’s CTO told Reuters that the “dark fear” his team had last summer hasn’t really come to fruition. Still, the plan involves hundreds of AI-friendly policy pages seeded on sites chatbots already cite. That’s less persuasion than plumbing. yahoo
Here’s what bugs me. A banner ad announces itself. A chatbot answer feels like a neutral librarian. If this works, persuasion hides inside the tool people use to dodge persuasion, and nothing in the answer tells you who nudged it.
“Campaigns used to buy the billboard. Now they’re renting the oracle, and the oracle doesn’t tell you who pushed the answer.”
- 💡 The Minogue pitch proposed creating hundreds of AI-friendly policy pages and citations across sites chatbots frequently cite (Reuters) 933thedrive
- 📊 CampSight, run by the Run for Something Action Fund, charges campaigns $9 to $250 a month for intel on what chatbots say about them (Reuters) 933thedrive
- 🧠 Consultant Joe Bonilla says AI-influence tactics will be ubiquitous by the 2028 cycle (Reuters) 933thedrive
Sources:
- Reuters (via Yahoo News) — Exclusive: US political candidates tailor messages for AI models used by voters
- Reuters (via 933 The Drive) — Exclusive: US political candidates tailor messages for AI models used by voters
Care to Read?
Jesse Blaze Calls It: America’s Doing Bits While the Bill Comes Due — September 4, 2026
🏭 Both Parties Just Discovered the Data Center Backlash
A data center is dividing a Wisconsin town, and the candidates for governor from both parties are scrambling to adjust their messaging. Rare bipartisanship: everyone’s suddenly nervous.
NPR visited Port Washington, where the mayor says the project will bring much-needed funding but the neighbors hate it, and where candidates for governor from both parties are adjusting their midterm messaging. Both sides are probably a little right, which is exactly why local politics gets loud. NPR
Now look at the ads. The Republican calls the Democrat “Data Center Dave” for refusing to roll back data center tax incentives, while another ad says Rep. Tom Tiffany voted for a bill to fast-track data centers and give them a $68 billion tax break. NPR
Translation: the AI buildout is a tax-break story, a power-bill story and a who-gets-listened-to story, and none of those fit neatly on a party line. When your own neighbors become the opposition, the usual script stops working.
“Data centers pulled off what Congress can’t: two parties’ attack ads agreeing on the villain, and it isn’t a person, it’s a tax break.”
- 💡 Candidates for governor from both parties are adjusting their campaign messaging because of the data center backlash (NPR) NPR
- 📊 One ad claims Tiffany backed a bill giving data centers a $68 billion tax break (NPR, ad claim) NPR
- 🧠 The mayor says the project brings much-needed funding; the neighbors disagree (NPR) NPR
Sources:
- NPR — Inside the massive data center tearing a Wisconsin community apart
- NPR — Why Wisconsin’s tight governor’s race matters
💰 The AI Double Whammy Nobody’s Pricing In
Everyone asks whether the AI bubble will burst. Fewer ask what happens to your job if it does, and Planet Money found research suggesting the answer is worse than “nothing.”
NPR’s Greg Rosalsky lays out a scenario where an AI bust triggers a recession, and the recession then speeds up the replacement of workers with AI. He calls it the AI double whammy. Bubbles often start with a genuinely big technology, then borrowers stretch and lenders get burned. kpbs
The second half is the sneaky part. Economists Nir Jaimovich and Henry Siu found that jobs vulnerable to earlier waves of automation lost most of their ground around recessions. Automation doesn’t glide in. It arrives in bursts, and the bursts cluster around downturns. kpbs
Nobody knows whether AI will earn back the money being borrowed and spent on it, and the piece says so. But follow the incentive: in a downturn, a CFO needs savings, a software license is cheaper than a salary, and layoffs look like discipline instead of choice.
“A recession is a permission slip. Companies were always going to automate; the downturn just lets them call the layoffs unavoidable.”
- 💡 Automation-vulnerable jobs mostly declined around past recessions, per Jaimovich and Siu’s study (NPR) kpbs
- 📊 The dot-com bust helped usher in a relatively mild recession (NPR) kpbs
- 🧠 Nobody yet knows whether AI profits will justify all the borrowing and spending (NPR) kpbs
Source: NPR (via KPBS) — What if an AI bubble bursts, and that accelerates AI job losses?
🧱 Closing the Border Closed the Issue Too
In 2022, a Texas border county’s best Republican organizers were migrants knocking on windows. Now the border’s closed, the issue has gone quiet, and raids are writing a new chapter.
The Washington Post’s Jack Herrera reports from Rio Grande City, Texas. In 2022, when Claudia Alcazar chaired the Starr County Republican Party, the most successful Republican organizers weren’t volunteers knocking on doors; they were migrants knocking on windows. The Washington Post
The same border communities that turned on Joe Biden as crossings surged are now souring on Trump as immigration raids round up their neighbors. The Post’s headline says it plainly: Trump closed down the border and ended it as a campaign issue. A political problem solved is a political weapon retired. The Washington Post
Here’s the uncomfortable symmetry. Border residents punished one president for chaos and are souring on the next over enforcement that reaches into their own streets. Both times, voters judged policy by what showed up on their block, not what polled well in Washington.
“Border voters don’t grade immigration on the national average. They grade it on what happens on their own block, and both parties keep forgetting that.”
- 💡 Border-town residents who turned on Biden over surging crossings are now souring on Trump over raids (WaPo) The Washington Post
- 🧠 The Post’s framing: a closed border ended the border as a campaign issue (WaPo) The Washington Post
Source: The Washington Post — Trump closed down the border — and ended it as a campaign issue
🤖 The Internet Now Has More Bots Than People
NPR’s Indicator says there are now more bots than humans online. The ads, the “viral” posts and the engagement were already shaky; now the audience might be a script too.
On Monday, The Indicator from Planet Money put it plainly: there are now more bots than humans online, and the episode asks what that means for how we experience the internet and whether bots and humans can coexist peacefully. Spoiler for anyone who’s read a comment section: unclear. NPR
Notice the image NPR chose: a World ID ad campaign with life-sized captchas surprising pedestrians in Berlin, Singapore and Buenos Aires. Per the caption, the stunt highlights how important proving you’re human is becoming on a bot-filled internet. That’s not a joke. That’s a product category. NPR
Think about who benefits. Much of the web is still sold on the assumption that humans are watching, and bots don’t buy sneakers. If the audience can’t be verified, the next growth business is verification itself, with “human” as the premium tier.
“When most of the internet is bots, ‘verified human’ stops being a feature and starts being a luxury good.”
- 💡 More bots than humans are now online (NPR) NPR
- 📊 World ID’s captcha stunt ran in Berlin, Singapore and Buenos Aires (NPR) NPR
- 🧠 NPR’s own question: can bots and humans peacefully coexist online? (NPR) NPR
Source: NPR — How bots are overtaking humans on the internet
🏠 Zoning Is Having a Bipartisan Moment
Gen Z candidates from both major parties are running on the same issue: housing. When red and blue agree on a villain, it’s usually something boring, like paperwork.
NPR’s Jennifer Ludden profiles Gen Z candidates from both parties who are focused on high housing costs, a top issue for voters in a midterm season laser-focused on affordability. One candidate said his generation is “in the thick of it,” citing housing, gas prices, student loans and a tough labor market. nprillinoisnprillinois
The interesting part is where the action is. One candidate says the real work is happening at the state level, where Gen Z and millennial lawmakers were part of a push to overhaul zoning and red tape. Not Washington. Not a viral hearing. Zoning codes. nprillinois
Here’s the incentive problem nobody wants on a yard sign: existing homeowners vote, and scarcity props up their biggest asset. Young renters can’t vote on a market they’re priced out of. So the generation locked out is the first to treat rules, not villains, as the target.
“The most bipartisan issue in America right now isn’t patriotism or puppies. It’s a zoning code that turns your rent into someone else’s retirement plan.”
- 💡 Gen Z candidates from both major parties are centering housing costs (NPR) nprillinois
- 📊 Housing costs are a top issue for voters in a midterms season focused on affordability (NPR) nprillinois
- 🧠 One candidate says the action is at the state level, where lawmakers pushed to overhaul zoning and red tape (NPR) nprillinois
Source: NPR (via NPR Illinois) — Gen Z candidates in both parties aim to tackle high housing costs
That’s a wrap for this week, friends. Keep your coffee strong, your mind curious, and your browser tabs weird.
— Jesse Blaze
Pick a side: should a town’s neighbors get a veto over a data center, or does the tax base win?